
Sample Reports
The reports in this section are examples of the work performed by the Nanomechanics' Analytical Services Laboratory.
Documents
hot!
| Date added: |
03/10/2011 |
| Date modified: |
05/10/2011 |
| Filesize: |
505.51 kB |
| Downloads: |
368 |
This sample report shows the effects of chemical exposure on the viscoelastic properties of O-rings. Each O-ring was characterized for storage modulus, loss modulus, and loss factor over a range of frequencies using nanoindentation.
hot!
| Date added: |
03/10/2011 |
| Date modified: |
05/10/2011 |
| Filesize: |
803.14 kB |
| Downloads: |
378 |

This sample report covers measuring the viscoelastic properties of a tire cross-section using nanoindentation. A map of the storage and loss modulus are made using 400 indentation tests and a cross-section of the tire is tested to examine the evolution of viscoelastic properties as each polymer layer is encountered.
hot!
| Date added: |
05/17/2011 |
| Date modified: |
11/30/2011 |
| Filesize: |
700.58 kB |
| Downloads: |
170 |
Four samples were supplied by coatings manufacturer for determination of the mechanical properties of the coatings using nanoindentation testing. Two of the samples were polymer substrates coated with hard protective coatings; the other two samples were the bare substrate materials consisting of CR39 and polycarbonate.
| Date added: |
05/17/2011 |
| Date modified: |
05/17/2011 |
| Filesize: |
518.58 kB |
| Downloads: |
95 |
The bulk polymer sample was a high-damping thermoplastic manufactured by E-A-R Aearo Technologies - a 3M® company. The polymer was cut to a size of 1” square and the surface was polished to remove any surface layer. Nanoindentation was used to perform viscoelastic characterization of the sample.
hot!
| Date added: |
06/07/2011 |
| Date modified: |
06/07/2011 |
| Filesize: |
351.74 kB |
| Downloads: |
352 |
Lithium based samples pose a challenge for mechanical testing due to their reactivity with moisture in the air. In the Nanomechanics' Analytical Service Laboratory, we are able to provide nanoindentation testing with the sample submerged in fluid. This article presents some of the nanoindentation work under fluids that has been completed in our labs. It also includes results for a fused silica reference material in dry conditions and submerged under mineral oil to verify that the results for elastic modulus and hardness were not adversely affected by the mineral oil.
hot!
| Date added: |
07/22/2011 |
| Date modified: |
07/22/2011 |
| Filesize: |
658.44 kB |
| Downloads: |
109 |
This report covers the reporting of hardness and elastic modulus results on thin low-k films. Commonly, the minimum properties are reported when testing soft films on hard substrates; however, with sub-micron films, these minimum properties can be heavily affected by errors in the tip area functions, environmental noise, and substrate influences. This report examines the results of a test technique which accurately accounts for the substrate influence and provides substrate-independent results of elastic modulus. These results are compared to the common technique of reporting minimum properties. All of the films presented have thicknesses between 400 nm and 600 nm. The results show and explain the importance of using models that account for the substrate influences in reporting the elastic modulus of the samples. It also shows that the hardness results are affected very little by substrate influences at 10% of the film thickness.
| Date added: |
11/24/2011 |
| Date modified: |
11/24/2011 |
| Filesize: |
1.66 MB |
| Downloads: |
37 |

This article details the scratch process used by the Nanomechanics' Analytical Services Laboratory to perform the scratch testing of ultra-thin low-k films. Failure is evaluated for 6 samples using scanning probe microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and generated scratch curves. The failure in the samples are identified in the data resulting from the scratch tests. Both cohesive and adhesive failures are examined.
new!
| Date added: |
02/07/2012 |
| Date modified: |
02/07/2012 |
| Filesize: |
1.59 MB |
| Downloads: |
10 |
In the preparation of low-k films for mechanical evaluation, the films are often deposited thicker than the “as-used” thickness. This is to minimize the influence of the substrate on the measurements of elastic modulus and hardness which is caused by the indentation stress field propagating through the film into the substrate and inflating the resulting properties. This article evaluates three commonly used analysis techniques for determining the elastic modulus of these films, two analysis techniques for determining the hardness of the films, and, finally, identifies the best analysis procedures for reporting the results. The evaluation is based on the results from testing three sets of low-k films – ranging in mechanical properties covering a usual range of elastic modulus and hardness for low-k films – that consisted of three thicknesses of nominally the same film composition. The results clearly identify the best analysis techniques for the determination of hardness and elastic modulus for low-k films.